📋 Tender Overview
Since the beginning of Russias full-scale war against Ukraine since February 24 2022 in addition to the armed attack there have also been cyber attacks in particular on key state registers that ensure citizens property rights. Then the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine turned off these registers from the general network ensuring their autonomous functioning and saving all data on the relevant servers. As Viktor Dubovik head of the Anti-Raiding Office of the Ministry of Justice said in an interview for UNIAN at this time no cybercriminals managed to access the information contained in these registers.In general the restrictions at the first stage were strict when only a very small list of registration actions was allowed. As of now almost all registration actions are allowed but with certain features that are due to our military historical period says Viktor Dubovik.Speaking about electronic registers he once again emphasized that the state currently allows the use of two media in civil circulation absolutely equal which confirm the right of ownership - both paper and electronic versions. But given the events that are happening around it is much easier to lose the paper carriers with the right of ownership than to somehow be deprived of an entry in the electronic register. So the combination of paper medium plus fixing in electronic provides protection from two sides. In order to enter information about ownership in the electronic register you should contact the state registrar or notary who has the right to conduct state registration during martial law.Against the backdrop of an increase in the number of registration actions in the country according to the head of the Anti-Raiding Office the number of complaints about these actions is also increasing. However compared to 2021 the percentage of complaints from the number of registration actions has almost halved. The introduced restrictions worked here. In particular access to the state registration system was granted only to those state registrars who were not subject to sanctions in state registers in the form of temporary blocking for a period of more than 3 months or cancellation of access to the relevant register.That is people who would like to commit illegal registration actions do not have such an opportunity. Currently the most risky are registration actions that can contribute to the avoidance by citizens and legal entities of the aggressor country of those sanctions imposed by national and international legislation. Therefore every notary and the state registrar must understand that when he receives documents that mention the aggressor country the Ministry of Justice will pay special attention to such registration and notarial actions says Viktor Dubovik.But among the classic risky registration actions the specialist singled out the followingapplication for mortgaged property in accordance with Art. 37 of the Law of Ukraine On Mortgages which allows a banking institution to acquire ownership rights to property that is pledged to the bank in connection with non-payment of a loan at this time such registration actions are prohibited with some exceptionsalienation of shares in authorized capital increase of authorized capital and dilution of shares in legal entitiesregistration actions related to the creation of new companies on the basis of forged documents.In May the Verkhovna Rada adopted a law on improving the mechanism of combating raiding. It is primarily aimed at two major areas. The first is the procedure for considering complaints regarding state registration. The second is changes for business in particular agricultural.The introduced key changes solve many problems that were inherited from 2016-2019. There are still global state projects that require improvement of the system of state registers etc. says the head of the Anti-Raiding Office.According to him in the future it is planned to introduce the institute of gradual registration actions. That is it will be a certain algorithmization of registration actions with technical blocks when the state registrar wants to perform an action in violation of the law and the system does not allow him to do so. In addition there is a gradual increase in information that the state registrar must receive not from paper media but from other state registers systems with which interaction is established which minimizes opportunities for fraudsters.
