📋 Tender Overview
The Ministry of Education and Training is drafting a Circular regulating the quality accreditation of higher education institutions. The quality accreditation cycle of higher education institutions is 5 years of drafting the circular stating that the wild chisel facilities use the set of standards to evaluate the quality of educational institutions to build, operate and develop the internal quality assurance system, guide and control all activities related to educational institutions; Self -evaluation, guarantee and constantly improving the quality of training. Educational quality inspection organizations use the set of standards to evaluate the quality of higher education institutions to evaluate the self -assessment dossier; External assessment, guidance on improving the system to ensure internal quality and improve the system operating method; Recognize or not recognize the quality standards of education for higher education institutions; Based on this set of standards to organize the development of additional criteria, guidance on evaluation of criteria for higher education institutions. Higher education institutions use this set of standards as a basis to complete the internal quality assurance system, improve management and operation of educational institutions. Other organizations and individuals have the basis to identify, evaluate and participate in social criticism for higher education institutions that they are interested in. The criteria for evaluating the quality of higher education institutions according to the draft, the set of quality assessment standards of higher education institutions include 15 standards: Standard 1: Vision, mission, culture and management of standards 2 Quality Standard 5: Network and relations with the external standard 6: Policies on training standard 7: Scientific research policies standard 8: Policies on community service standard 9: Standard quality assurance system 10: Information system assurance internal quality standard 11: Quality improvement standard quality 12: Standard research results The results of the standard community 15: The results of the financial market. b- External assessment; c- Evaluation of evaluation results; d- Recognize meeting the quality standards of education. have a system that is established and operated with clear policies and processes, which are consistently implemented; There are practical evidences of continuous implementation and improvement. Lack of evidences of actual operation or no quality improvement. On the above provisions, the educational quality accreditation organization stipulates more details of the levels of achievements, failing to meet the criteria requirements, and at the same time, the assessment guidance helps the training facility to know the situation to improve the quality of educational institutions. not more than two criteria not reached the criteria with six or more criteria; There is no criterion that does not meet the standards of two to three criteria. Over eighteen criteria. The Department of Higher Education is responsible for implementing quality improvement measures within twenty -four months from the date of recognition to achieve conditional. Must be evaluated outside and issued a written request to organize the quality accreditation of education to consider recognizing the quality standards of education. Education and Training is gathering comments on the Ministrys E -portal.
