📋 Tender Overview
ONAJUP official, Enith Pinedo Bravo, explained the implementation of protocols in Intercultural Justice. The Judiciary is one of the institutions that makes important advances at the intercultural level, among which there are two important plenary agreements at the intercultural level, both in the jurisdictional and organic areas. This was stated by Enith Pinedo Bravo, Intercultural Justice advisor of the National Office of Peace Justice and Indigenous Justice. During an interview granted to the digital program Punto de Acceso, broadcast on social networks by the Commission for Access to Justice for People in Conditions of Vulnerability and Justice in your Community of the Superior Court of Justice of Callao, the official maintained that the The Supreme Court, in 2009, held a plenary session on the powers that peasant patrols have to administer justice and in 2015 on cases of rape against indigenous girls, women and adolescents.
This plenary agreement aims to establish criteria for anthropological expertise that studies ethnic-cultural reality. Likewise, the Judiciary has specific rules such as coordination protocols between the justice system, judicial action protocol, regulations for registration of authors and performers, among other initiatives that aim to positively value their rights and for these people to do so. assess their particularities in their judicial processes. The Peruvian State is obliged to guarantee the rights of these people, she maintained.
Since 2020, ONAJUP has undertaken actions such as collecting information for the construction of baselines, where clear goals and indicators are evaluated to help identify indigenous people in judicial processes. Furthermore, the ethnic variable has been incorporated into the comprehensive judicial system that allows people to be identified by their traits and origin, so that the judge has access to this information and decides according to these criteria of intercultural justice.
