📋 Tender Overview
With 433/440 delegates voting in favor (accounting for 91.54%), the National Assembly officially passed the Law on Execution of Civil Judgments (THADS) (amended) this afternoon (December 5). Voting results to approve the Law on Enforcement of Civil Judgments (amended). Before the delegates pressed the button to approve and reported a number of major issues in explaining, receiving and revising the draft Law on Civil Judgment Execution (amended), Chairman of the Law and Justice Committee Hoang Thanh Tung said that after being received, revised, submitted to the National Assembly for consideration and approved, the draft law had 5 chapters and 116 articles (down 2 articles compared to the draft Law on Government submitted to the National Assembly). According to Accordingly, regarding the application of information technology and digital transformation in judgment enforcement, there are suggestions to clearly stipulate the legal value of electronic documents and data in judgment enforcement so that credit institutions and banks do not delay providing information or block accounts when receiving electronic requests. Receiving comments from National Assembly delegates, the National Assembly Standing Committee has directed the revision of the draft Law in the direction of clearly stipulating that digitally signed electronic documents and data have the same legal value as documents. Paper copy. At the same time, it stipulates the responsibilities of the State Treasury, credit institutions... to promptly comply with the requests of civil enforcement agencies (whether in paper or electronic documents), overcoming delays in providing information and blocking accounts. Regarding the civil judgment enforcement organization system, there are suggestions to regulate the model of civil judgment enforcement agencies in the direction of organizing a 2-level model at the local level (provincial and regional levels) to be similar to the model of the Peoples Court and the Institute. Peoples Procuracy, convenient for coordination work. Some opinions suggest adding the judicial title Chief Execution Officer to the Regional Civil Judgment Judgment Office. Chairman of the Law and Justice Committee Hoang Thanh Tung said that implementing Conclusion No. 162 of the Politburo, the draft Law stipulates that the civil judgment enforcement system includes: Civil Judgment Judgment Management Agency under the Ministry of Justice, 34 provincial-level Civil Judgment Judgment Agencies and 355 Regional Judicial Judgment Judgment Offices under the provincial-level Civil Judgment Judgment Agency. The Draft Law has supplemented Supplementing the judicial title Chief Executioner to be appointed to the Head of the Regional Civil Judgment Judgment Office to ensure uniformity in direction and inter-sectoral coordination in civil judgment enforcement work in the locality. Regarding deadlines and procedures for executing judgments, many opinions suggest reviewing and shortening deadlines in the process of organizing judgment execution to minimize costs and time for executing judgments in the spirit of Resolution No. 27. The National Assembly Standing Committee has directed to shorten many important deadlines. important in the process of organizing judgment enforcement such as: time limit for verifying judgment execution conditions, time limit for notification of judgment execution, time limit for signing contracts to exploit assets for judgment enforcement, time limit for prioritizing the purchase of assets for judgment enforcement... In addition to the above issues, the National Assembly Standing Committee has directed the review and maximum absorption of opinions from National Assembly delegates to complete regulations on handling specific assets (digital assets, virtual currencies), transferring physical evidence warehouses to the Ministry of Public Security for management and responsibilities. of the Peoples Procuracy in supervising judgment enforcement and many other provisions of the draft Law.Hai Lien
