📋 Tender Overview
Meeting in plenary session at the Hall this afternoon (August 11), the National Assembly discussed the National Assemblys Resolution project on crime prevention and law violations, the work of the Peoples Procuracy, the Peoples Court and judgment enforcement. Download The National Assembly discusses the National Assemblys Resolution project on the work of preventing and combating crimes and violations of the law, the work of the Peoples Procuracy, the Peoples Court and the work of judgment enforcement. This is a draft Resolution built to replace Resolution No. 96/2019/QH14 of the National Assembly on the work of preventing and combating crime and law violations, the work of the Peoples Procuracy, the Peoples Court and the work of judgment enforcement.Resolution to build a system of targets and tasks to meet the Partys requirements; It is both a goal for judicial agencies to strive for and a tool and criterion for the National Assembly to evaluate the performance of agencies. At the same time, this is the basis for strengthening accountability, supervision, and power control in prevention, detection, investigation, prosecution, adjudication, and judgment enforcement. Creating a stable environment to promote socio-economic development. Many delegates emphasized that the development and promulgation of the Resolution must contribute to improving the quality and effectiveness of the fight against crime, law violations, investigation, prosecution, trial, and judgment enforcement; sustainably reduce all types of crime; maintain political security, order, social safety, create a stable environment to promote socio-economic development. At the same time, the Resolution must create a basis for the National Assembly to accurately and objectively evaluate the results of crime prevention and law violations, investigation, prosecution, trial and sentence execution. Mentioning the target number of temporarily suspended cases at point i, clause 1, Article 2, delegate Dang Bich Ngoc (Phu Tho) for We know that some cases and cases may have to be temporarily suspended due to the fact that the person who committed the act has not been identified, the suspect has not been identified, waiting for the results of appraisal, asset valuation, mutual legal assistance or other objective grounds. Therefore, the number of cases and cases temporarily suspended does not mean limitations or violations in investigation activities. The delegate proposed to adjust point i, Clause 1, Article 2 in the direction: Strive to reduce by up to 5% the number of cases and cases temporarily suspended compared to the previous year, not allowing temporary suspensions or illegal suspensions to occur, in order to properly reflect the goal of reducing the number of temporarily suspended cases, and at the same time not create pressure to restore the investigation when the grounds for temporary suspension remain. Also. Regarding the target of asset recovery in corruption and economic cases at point k, clause 1, Article 2, delegate Dang Bich Ngoc said that, during the investigation phase, the results should be evaluated on the basis of money and assets that have been discovered, verified, traced, detained, blocked, and distrained. The confiscation, return and disposal of assets also depends on the results of prosecution, trial and judgment execution. Therefore, the delegates proposed regulations in the direction of investigation agencies, inspection agencies, State Audit, Peoples Procuracy, Peoples Court and judgment enforcement agencies to closely coordinate in prevention, detection and handling; Apply measures according to the provisions of law to ensure the recovery of money and assets in criminal cases of corruption and economics. Affirming the need to develop and promulgate a Resolution to meet the requirements of judicial reform, in accordance with changes in the law on the organization of the apparatus and the practice of judicial work, delegate Nguyen Xuan Ky (Hanoi) said that through implementation practice, work requirements are increasing, the nature of cases and incidents is increasingly increasing. complicated. Therefore, the new regulations in the draft Resolution are not only professional targets but also a basis for evaluating the results and responsibilities of each agency. Regarding the rate of resolution and adjudication of criminal cases, civil cases, and administrative cases specified in Point a, Clause 1, Article 4, delegate Nguyen Xuan Ky proposed to consider setting quantitative targets. According to the delegate, it is necessary to evaluate the courts activities on the basis of the quality of trials and compliance with the resolution deadlines prescribed by law. The delegate said that the procedural law has strictly regulated the resolution deadline for each type of case, while the current workload of the court has increased greatly. In fact, there are many cases that are protracted due to objective reasons such as having to wait for the results of appraisal and valuation of assets. Delegate Le Van Dong (HCMC) said that setting a number of new targets and tasks in the draft Resolution also sets requirements for responsibilities and conditions to ensure implementation for the authorities. These include periodically innovating reports, promoting the application of information technology, digital transformation, and electronic data interconnection between judicial agencies in a professional and modern direction. According to delegates, these contents are in line with the inevitable trend, contributing to reducing the load of internal procedures, shortening work processing time, improving openness, transparency and efficiency in the work of preventing and combating crimes and violations of the law. Complete the draft Resolution with the highest quality On behalf of the Board Drafting, Chairman of the Law and Justice Committee PhAn Chi Hieu respectfully thanks the enthusiastic and responsible opinions of the National Ass
