📋 Tender Overview
The magistrates not only listened to the lawyers arguments, but also asked a series of questions for a better resolution.The Plenary Session of the Constitutional Court (TC) met in public hearing and, after listening to the oral reports of the lawyers of both parties, left thirteen demands for vote, among them, the jurisdictional one presented by the National Elections Jury (JNE) against the Judiciary.
The session began at 9:15 in the morning with the jurisdictional lawsuit (File No. 00005-2025-CC/TC) filed by the JNE against the Judiciary, in which the electoral body argued that it has exclusive jurisdiction to: 1) Maintain and safeguard the registry of political organizations; 2) Ensure compliance with the regulations on political organizations and other electoral provisions; and 3) Administer justice in electoral matters.
The magistrates not only listened to the lawyers arguments, but also asked a series of questions for a better resolution. At the end of the public hearing, 2 unconstitutionality processes, 1 jurisdictional process, 8 amparo processes and 2 habeas corpus were up for vote.
The judges Luz Pacheco Zerga (president), Helder Dominguez Haro (vice president), Francisco Morales Saravia (he did it virtually), Gustavo Gutierrez Ticse, Manuel Monteagudo Valdez, Cesar Ochoa Cardich and Pedro Hernandez Chavez participated in the hearing.
The hearing took place at the San Isidro headquarters, at Av. Arequipa 2720, and was broadcast on our website and social networks of the institution.
Lima, February 17, 2026
Communications and Institutional Image Office of the Constitutional Court
