📋 Tender Overview
Accepting risks in scientific and technological activities and innovation is necessary, but it is necessary to have criteria for evaluation, appraisal process ... otherwise this mechanism may be taken advantage of, causing loss of state budget. Delegate Tran Khanh Thu (Doan Thai Binh) commented on discussion on May 13, continuing the program of the 9th session, the National Assembly discussed at the hall on the project of Science, Technology and Innovation Law (amended). At the discussion session, the National Assembly deputies recorded a comprehensive amendment of the law after more than a decade of implementation, and made many specific suggestions to institutionalize Resolution No. 57 -NQ/TW of the Politburo, overcome the institutional, financial and resource -level bottlenecks, promote the innovation of nature in all areas of economic life - society. Development, which is also an urgent step to concretize the spirit of Resolution 57. If the 2013 Law on Science and Technology has gradually laid the foundation for the legal system in this field, the draft amended this time is more responsible. According to delegate Tran Khanh Thu, one of the principle changes in this draft law is the focus of research activities in the public sector to promote application, transfer and technological innovation in the enterprise sector - where the final effectiveness of innovation is creative. Schools and institutes play a role in supporting and providing knowledge resources, accompanying businesses to create new products, new technologies and new values for the economy; In addition, this draft law is to remove the bottlenecks of institutions, finance and resources to motivate the development. learn; doi khi chi tu y tuong, thuc tien hoac su ket hop nhung cai da co san. Therefore, it is impossible to equate innovation activities with traditional scientific research activities. If there is a lack of clear criteria, it will be difficult to determine what is eligible for recognition, financial support, investment incentives or to be considered for commendation. Delegation suggests the Drafting Board supplementing the criteria for evaluating innovative activities such as: New (new technical, organization, model) or first implementation of local/national/international implementation; kha nang tao gia tri gia tang va hieu qua kinh te - xa hoi; kha nang nhan rong, thuong mai hoa; Intellectual property or practical applied.In the field of health, delegate Tran Khanh Thu said that the research and testing of health technology always faced high risks, complicated processes and requires the acceptance of failure as an indispensable part. However, at present, there is still lack of flexible testing mechanisms, lack of policies to encourage new techniques to apply new techniques. At the same time, developing digital medicine, biotechnology, new pharmaceuticals and building a safe medical data platform. In particular, it is necessary to create a sandbox to test new technology in a realistic environment but control risks; Establishing a specialized innovation nursery to support the initiative from reality. Delegation also emphasized the need to share lessons from failures in research. The construction of an open data warehouse on failures will be a common knowledge property, helping the community not to repeat mistakes and support policy orientation.The idea for Article 9 of the Draft Law, delegate Tran Khanh Thu said that the regulations on accepting risks in scientific research and innovation are still general, unclear criteria and have not identified competent authorities to assess. hieu sai, bi loi dung gay that thoat ngan sach nha nuoc, dai bieu neu ro. Ba de nghi bo sung nguyen tac toi thieu ve tieu chi danh gia rui ro hop ly; At the same time, developing the approval process, a clear risk determination mechanism in the documents guiding the implementation of the Law. Regarding the budget, delegate Tran Khanh Thu said that the draft regulating budget expenditure for science and technology and innovation at least 2%, while the Central Resolution 57 of the Central Committee determined to be 3%, therefore, it is necessary to be modified accordingly to institutionalize the guiding viewpoints. The National Assembly discusses the Hall on the Law on Science, Technology and Innovation Law (amended) clear criteria for the special task to avoid abuse of specific mechanisms to discuss and compassionate.Nguyen Hoang Bao Tran (Doan Binh Duong) expressed high consensus and consensus with the provisions of Clause 2, Clause 3, Article 14 of the Draft Law on Scientific and technological tasks, special innovation and science, technology and innovation programs that are specially applied for investment, financial and management mechanisms as prescribed by the Government. Breakthrough, serving the development of core technology, new technology is highly risky. In accordance with the specific and flexible nature in this field. Therefore, the regulation is still in general, lacking the criteria to determine what is a special task and program , this is easy to lead to abuse or asking - giving as well as authorizing the Government without principles and limits that can easily lead to arbitrary, lack of transparency, difficult to control and not specifying the responsibility of the explanation, the application of the special source of the source of the source of the source. Thus, in order to ensure the transparency and feasibility in implementing the effective and effective effect as well as to ensure the provisions of the Law are stricter, delegates propose to consider and supplement the provisions of Section 3 of the Draft Content: The Government specifies the criteria for determining the tasks, special programs and investment mechanisms, finance, specific management and appropriate supervision mechanism. At the same time, in addition to the law, it is necessary to have detailed instructions by the decree or documents under the law
